Flash Update: Polar Bear in Ridley

Julie is in critical condition and could not be reached for comment. Baxter is still on loose and believed to be in Milwaukee.
Read more.
The Scene: A group of friends at breakfast. They are discussing what is going on in the world of politics, sports, pop culture, and whatever else mildly amuses them. They are also eating pancakes.
It’s been an odd turn of events that brought the school voucher issue to this blog, but I thought that it would be worthwhile to post on. My view is that vouchers would help our school systems. Due to good fortune, I was the beneficiary of Catholic grade school and high school (I didn’t walk into a classroom without a cross over the door until about a year-and-a-half ago). At these private schools, I was treated to a very, high level of learning and was continually challenged by my teachers to reach my potential. One major element that contributed to that quality product was the fact that my parents could have pulled me out of the school at anytime and take their business elsewhere.
What Sports Illustrate – I found this article by Dr. E while bumming around Google looking for links. Dr. E has a wonderful ability to seamlessly tie together topics like sports, sex, religion, and camaraderie. As always, he throws in a twist at the end. If I could write a tenth as well as this guy, this blog would be da bomb.
Steinbrenner guarantees victory – Cannon’s thoughts on the matter: this guarantee is probably the result of a 14-hour, Tom Collins bender with Joe Namath.
I’ve always lived in a little cocoon. I’d root for every team in New England, listen to The Score, and read the ProJo. Occasionally, a Yankee fan or Packer fan (in the mid-nineties) or Laker fan would interlope into my world. Those brief encounters would never affect me in any way. It was almost always good-natured and the back-and-forth barbs never operated as anything more than guy banter.
The last year or so the debate on same-sex marriage has become more and more prominent, especially due to the Massachusetts’s Supreme Court. It’s particularly loaded because of all the different balls that are floating in the air. Marriage has obvious religious meaning, but is also just another form of state licensing, similar to driver’s and liquor licenses, at its base. (Expandable Post)
Offensive t-shirts brought to you by Maxim. -- I’m a big fan of “Designated Purse Holder”.
AWESOME FLASH UPDATE -- 9:33, Wednesday, February 15
Good morning, everyone! Happy Awesome Day (working title)! Before we start, I wanted to share my mission statement with you, my beloved friends.
The definition of ‘iconoclast’ is “one who attacks and seeks to overthrow traditional or popular ideas or institutions.” In this spirit, I have turned my all-seeing eye upon the institution of Valentine’s Day.
onLike most of you reading this, I was snowed in for the majority of the weekend. Since I was all by lonesome and without da foosball, I had the opportunity to dig into my bookshelf and DVD case. Here’s what I rocked:
It’s getting to the point where we should probably rename the blog or something. Here’s some more on Green #4.
Where’s our money?
Just throwing some grenades. Enjoy.
So far, the Ryan Gomes era has not exactly gotten with a bang. Through a total 49 games, he has played in 28 and started none. He is averaging 8.4 minutes in games in which he has played. He’s also not exactly filling it up with an average of 1.9 points per game and shooting a paltry 33% from the field. The one bright spot is that, and this is according to NBA.com, he ranks #14 in the league in offensive rebounds per 48 minutes. So, he’s got that going for him.
Programming Note: I apologize for the infrequent updates the last couple of days. The wireless at school has been acting a lot funky. I promise that as soon as it’s sorted out, I’ll be back to writing and posting (instead of paying attention in FedTax).
Please forgive my law school nerd-acity. But this is a fantastic display of revenge and avarice.
Here goes nothing:
Question: If you get too drunk to remember a Super Bowl, does it still happen?
Chuck Klosterman: Yes. But the game is then played in Narnia.
A lot of squawk the last few days, on this blog and the venerable axisofright.blogspot.com, over what the Senate’s job is during the judicial confirmation process. As always, the answer, and the explanation, can always be found at The Baseball Crank. If you are a fan of baseball and interested in politics (with a dash of pop culture), you absolutely must read the Crank.
Below is a thumbnail sketch of the different philosophies that a senator could employ in choosing how to examine a judicial nominee, as supplied by the Baseball Crank. If you want the real thing, click here.
Deference to the President – This test is basically a minimum qualifications test, similar that you would find in the hiring practices of any Denny’s. The only difference is that instead of a GED and US citizenship, the nominee also has to have J.D.
Judicial Philosophy – This model calls for the Senate to examine whether or not a nominee has reasonable process for deciding issues called before her. This one seems the most wishy-washy of the bunch for me. It would seem to me that HOW a candidate would come down on some issues would tend to matter. Additionally, I don’t think that we need to be giving lawyers bonus points for rationalizing whatever crazy positions they come up with (see Same-Sex Marriage and the Mass. Supreme Court).
The President’s Promises – This one is preferred by the Crank. It states that, as long as the president has nominated someone consistent with the flag he campaigned under, the Senate should confirm.
The Senator’s Choice – This model allows each senator to vote however she wants. Much like Burger King, they can have it their way.
Consensus – The “Everyone Must Get Along and Play Nice” model. This model has the benefit of assuring that NO ONE would ever get appointed to any court. Personally, I don’t think that this one sounds all that bad...from a “I never liked the Court that much anyway” perspective.
Litmus Test – I actually like this framework the best. There are some issues that are deal-breakers in my mind. I would absolutely never vote for a pro-choice judicial nominee, for example. I suspect that many other pro-lifers advocating other models are secretly on-board with this philosophy. My support of this model also probably illustrates why I’d never make a very good judge (or senator, for that matter). NOTE: I understand that the flip side of this coin would allow the other guys to choose what their “litmus” issue is and I’m fine with that. All I ask is that there is less “hiding the ball.”
Status Quo – Bar none, the absolute worst philosophy. If applied throughout American history, we’d still have segregation. As it is, the federal courts are the least-democratic institution that we’ve got. This model would make it worse.
WORLD BEARD AND MOUSTACHE CHAMPIONSHIPS!
Gregg Easterbrook has been writing this column for a couple of years now. Click here to check it out.
For those of you not familiar with TMQ, it is a kind of thinking man’s football column. Easterbrook is a legit intellectual as well. I finished reading his book, The Progress Paradox, a couple of weeks ago and it was fantastic. On parenthetical note, his brother is a judge on the United States Court of Appeals in the Seventh Circuit, the Honorable Frank Easterbrook. Judge Easterbrook is a real econowank and I’ve gotten a heavy dose of his opinions in Contracts and Law & Economics.
Thoughts from the column: